The most recent definition of predatory journals and publishers was published in Nature. This definition was agreed upon at the Predatory Summit in Ottawa, Canada, in April 2019.
“Predatory journals and publishers are entities that prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship and are characterized by false or misleading information, deviation from best editorial and publication practices, a lack of transparency, and/or the use of aggressive and indiscriminate solicitation practices.”
At the same Summit, participants also discussed four alternative terms, “dark”, “deceptive”, “illegitimate” and “acting in bad faith”. The recommendation was to keep the term “predatory” while noting its limitation.
CREDIT: Illustration by David Parkins, courtesy of Nature
Sources:
Cukier, S., Lalu, M., Bryson, G. L., Cobey, K. D., Grudniewicz, A., & Moher, D. (2020). Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: A modified Delphi consensus process. BMJ Open, 10(2), e035561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035561
Grudniewicz, A., Moher, D., Cobey, K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., ... & Lalu, M. M. (2019). Predatory journals: No definition, no defence. Nature, 576, 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
The results of a study to examine the reasons why authors publish in predatory journals emerged in four themes:
Source:
Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals?.Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150
Here are some of the risks if you publish with a predatory publisher or present in a predatory conference:
Credit: RSTF Joint Guide: Predatory Publishing (https://libguides.nie.edu.sg/RSTF-predatory-publishing)